Showing posts with label Leage of Conservation Voters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leage of Conservation Voters. Show all posts

4/18/2012

Lobby for NC Environment, May 30

The North Carolina General Assembly returns to Raleigh in May. Those of us who care about land and water conservation need to let our legislators know how important this issue is for North Carolina.
Please make plans to join us for Land for Tomorrow Lobby Day on Wednesday, May 30 to help us tell our conservation story and ensure continued support for the state’s four conservation trust funds. 
You know firsthand the difference that land and water conservation has made in your community and across the state. Your legislators need to hear from you so they can understand how important this issue is for their constituents.
Visit landfortomorrow.org for more details and to register for Lobby Day.
See you in Raleigh on May 30th!

6/30/2011

Big Thank You to Gov. Purdue--No to Fracking, etc.

Environmental Coalition Praises Governor Perdue For Vetoing GOP-Backed Bills That Would Have Hurt North Carolina's Environment and Economy


Coalition includes: Clean Water for North Carolina, Environment North Carolina, Environmental Defense Fund, North Carolina Coastal Federation, NC Conservation Network, NC League of Conservation Voters, NC Sierra Club, NC Wildlife Federation, Southern Environmental Law Center, Western North Carolina Alliance and others.

Governor Perdue’s historic vetoes of S 781 and S 709 are to be commended. The 2011 session of the N.C. General Assembly has carried out a relentless assault on the environment, and Governor Perdue understands that. The legislature has attacked environmental safeguards, land conservation, financial incentives for the wise management of our natural heritage, and even environmental education. We applaud the Governor for standing up to these assaults.

S 781, Regulatory Reform Act of 2011, would have handcuffed state agencies from creating environmental protections for North Carolina’s air and water. By vetoing S 781, the Governor recognizes that North Carolinians overwhelmingly support keeping or strengthening N.C.’s environmental safeguards.

S 709, Energy Jobs Act, would have put North Carolina’s thriving coastal tourism economy at risk, in search of elusive offshore drilling revenues. The bill would have also pushed North Carolina to begin hydraulic fracturing (fracking) for natural gas, a dangerous process which contaminates groundwater and has caused devastation in other eastern states.

Also, a copy of the letter submitted to the Governor asking for the veto of anti-environmental bills, which contains a complete listing of all 33 groups, can be found at: http://www.wral.com/asset/news/state/nccapitol/2011/06/21/9758002/Env_veto.PDF

For More Information

Clean Water for North Carolina -- Hope Taylor, 919-401-9600, hope@cwfnc.org

Environment North Carolina -- Elizabeth Ouzts, 919-833-0015, elizabeth@environmentnorthcarolina.org

Environmental Defense Fund - Jane Preyer, w 919-881-2912, c 919-740-6727, jpreyer@edf.org

North Carolina Conservation Network - Brian Buzby, 919-247-3617, brian@ncconservationnetwork.org

North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Dan Crawford, 919-839-0020, dan@nclcv.org

N.C. Wildlife Federation --Tim Gestwicki, 704-332-5696, tim@ncwf.org

N.C. Sierra Club --Molly Diggins, 919-919-833-8467, molly.diggins@sierraclub.org

Southern Environmental Law Center - Derb Carter, 919-967-1450, derbc@selcnc.org

Western North Carolina Alliance - Julie Mayfield, 828-258-8737, Julie@wnca.org

3/28/2011

Legislative Update, NC League of Conservations Voters

Legislative Watch: Dismembering DENR; Turning Off the Green Lights; Hot Rail

Outrageous attacks on past environmental gains continue in the General Assembly.

Dismembering DENR: The N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) is our state's primary executive agency for implementing state laws and programs managing natural resources, and protecting clean air and water and public health. As such, it is the natural lightning rod for those politicians who do not believe in supporting any of those missions. That opposition is now manifesting itself in the open hostility of bills which would cut away key sub-parts of DENR and send them to other agencies. Last week saw the filing of SB 388, "Transfer Forestry & Forestry Council to DACS", joining the previously filed SB 229, "Transfer DENR Soil & Water to DACS". These bills would remove the forestry management and soil erosion control agencies from DENR and send them to the state Agriculture department, which is run by the independently elected Agriculture Commissioner instead of the governor. (The Ag department has traditionally been regarded as more firmly controlled by the agribusiness lobby and hostile to most environmental regulations.) Other proposals would cut away still other offices from DENR and send them to Commerce or the Wildlife Resources Commission. Commenting on these moves, Rep. Joe Hackney (D-Chatham) told the Raleigh News & Observer, "What I perceive is a generalized attack on all parts of DENR. There are some people who want to dismantle it and reduce it to little or nothing. There are others who want to neuter its regulatory side, which the public will not like. The public places a high value on clean water and clean air."

Turning Off the Green Lights: Meanwhile, the opponents of expanding North Carolina's use of renewable energy sources in the generation of electricity are weighing in through HB 431, "Repeal Senate Bill 3 of the 2007 Session". SB 3 (2007) contained both good (i.e., REPS) and bad (i.e., CWIP financing) provisions, but it's on some groups' hit parade today because of its good points: It directs that electric utilities produce a minimum percentage of their electricity from renewable energy resources. Anti-environmental policy groups like the John Locke Foundation have an abiding disdain for green energy, and continue to wail that the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (REPS) will raise electric rates (without contributing to their friends in the oil and nuclear industries). It's uncertain how far HB 431 will progress, since even the power companies now support the 2007 SB 3 as adopted, and have entered into a number of power-purchase contracts from renewable energy sources as a result.

Hot Rail: Rail has become the energy-efficient transportation system that anti-environmentalists love to hate. Incredibly, a Mecklenburg County legislator (Rep. Ric Killian, R-Mecklenburg) has filed a bill (HB 422, "No High-Speed Rail Money from Federal Gov't.") which would turn back a federal grant which includes $152 million now slated to improve rail safety and efficiency in his home county. That's how much of the total grant of $461 million in high-speed rail-enabling track and intersection improvements is targeted for improvements in Mecklenburg. The rest would go to improving track and addressing rail/street intersection problems across the Piedmont between Charlotte and Raleigh. The excuse for this anti-rail money madness is that high-speed rail would cost tax money to maintain on an ongoing basis. However, does anyone wish to bet that Rep. Killian would be...ahem...tarred & feathered & ridden out of town on a rail...by his constituents if he introduced legislation to turn down Charlotte beltway funds on similar grounds? The hypocrisy involved is staggering. Twelve other Representatives (all Republicans) have signed on to this legislation, which would cost North Carolina up to an estimated 5,000 construction-related jobs at a time when the state's unemployment rate exceeds 9%. The bill is scheduled to be heard in the House Transportation Committee tomorrow (Tuesday, March 29) at noon.

Regulatory Watch: Speak Up for Public Health and a Clean Environment

Two weeks ago CIB advised our readers of a series of so-called "regulatory reform" hearings planned as a means of generating support for stripping clean air and water protections off the rulebooks in North Carolina. Those hearings kicked off last week, and they continue this afternoon in Guilford County.

The good news is that opponents of environmental quality have not had the public stage to themselves thus far. At the first hearing in Wilmington on March 11, supporters of environmental quality were also present in force and spoke eloquently. According to the Wilmington Star-News, area resident Laura Parks kicked off the public comments by reminding committee members, "When you seek to weed through these regulations, know that we also rely on regulations to protect us...We may not be a business, just operating the business of our homes."

Environmental allies cannot afford to rest, however. Several additional hearings are planned by the "Joint Regulatory Reform Committee", including one today (Monday, March 28) from 1 to 3 p.m., at the Jamestown campus of Guilford Technical Community College, 601 High Point Road, Jamestown NC. Speakers will have up to two minutes to address the committee. Sign-up to speak begins at 12:30 p.m. Those who cannot attend can send comments to the committee care of regreform@ncleg.net.

Supporters of protecting clean air and water and public health are being called upon to stand up at these hearings to defend the laws and programs which protect our health and environment. Time and place details for the remaining public hearings (April 4, Winterville; April 15, Flat Rock; and April 21, Raleigh) can be found here: http://www.ncleg.net/documentsites/committees/jointregreform/Joint%20Regulatory%20Reform%20Meeting%20Schedule.pdf.

According to U.S. PIRG (Public Interest Research Group), 108 million Americans live within 50 miles of one of the 104 operating commercial nuclear power plants in the United States. How many of them have received any information on emergency response or evacuation alternatives in the event of radiation releases similar to those taking place in Japan now?

Fears also continued to grow regarding the risk of further radiation leaks from spent fuel rods stored in pools outside the damaged reactors. In Japan as in the United States, tons of highly radioactive waste are stored in pools near but outside the reactor buildings. In the United States, almost 72,000 tons of these spent fuel rods are in temporary storage on plant sites, with more than three-quarters of the waste still very hot and sitting in water-filled pools for cooling. The amount of this intensely radioactive waste, which will remain toxic for tens of thousands of years, is currently growing in the U.S. at a rate of about 2,200 tons per year. When pools with the hot spent fuel are not kept filled with water, the residual heat of the rods can melt their casing and release highly dangerous radioactive isotopes to the environment. There is substantial concern that such releases already may have occurred in Japan.

Campaign Watch: Early Attacks Begin Against Environmental Ally

With the 2012 election year still nine months away, an automated telephone call attack campaign has already been launched against environmental ally U.S. Rep. Brad Miller (D-NC13). Miller's Congressional district is considered a likely target of redistricting efforts this year to reduce his support in 2012. In preparation for the expected campaign targeting Miller, the Republican Congressional Campaign Committee has initiated recorded calls to voters in the 13th District accusing Miller of supporting policies to raise gas prices. The calls implicitly refer to Miller's support for common-sense restrictions on offshore drilling. Miller responds that "according to the Bush Administration's Department of Energy, opening our entire continental shelf to oil drilling without regard to any environmental concern would not lower the price at the pump [for gasoline] at all. No amount of chanting 'drill, baby, drill' is going to change all that."
Education & Resources: Chances to Support Rail Transit
Finally this week, we note that residents of the Research Triangle region will have an opportunity to support development of its local, energy-efficient rail and bus transit system at four public workshops this week (March 28, 29, 30 and 31). For details on when, where, and how, see www.ourtransitfuture.com.

10/22/2008

$3 Million to Re-elect Elizabeth Dole

http://www.kayhagan.com/action/buyingherseat
[Dole has been ineffective in office, has been rubberstamping Bush policies, is now having to 'buy' her seat.
Elect Kay Hagan, endorsed by Democrats, conservationists, educators. And vote early!]

5/10/2008

Conservation Insider Bulletin, May 9

Conservation Insider Bulletin

Published weekly for the Conservation Council of North Carolina
Conservation News to Peruse & Use
Editor: Dan Besse, cib@conservationcouncilnc.org

May 9, 2008

We examine the results of the NC primary in races of environmental interest, and take a look at the status of national environmental endorsements, this week in CIB:

--Campaign Watch, NC: CCNC Endorsements Fare Well in Primary
--Campaign Watch, Washington: FOE Endorses Obama; LCV's Endorsements List

Campaign Watch, NC: CCNC Endorsements Fare Well in Primary

CCNC's endorsed candidates fared well in the primary voting this week, with 10 of 11 of those endorsed winning their races. CCNC Political Director Brownie Newman reports:

Lt. Governor-- In spite of a strong campaign, we were sorry to see Dan Besse lose his bid for Lt. Gov. The race was won by Sen. Walter Dalton. He will face Robert Pittenger in November.

Now the good news. We won all these contests:
State Treasurer--Janet Cowell defeated a well-financed opponent, Buncombe County Commissioner David Young.
Cowell, 47%, 596,000
Young, 36%, 456,000
Weisel, 17%, 219,000
Senate District 5-- Donald Davis came in first place among the five candidates. He will face a run-off against Kathy Taft as no one garnered more than 40% of the vote. The strong showing by Davis indicates he will be the front-runner in the run-off..
Donald Davis, 36%, 10,180
Kathy Taft, 24%, 6846
Ed Wilson, 14%, 3866
Tony Moore, 12%, 3504
Charles Johnson, 6%, 1564
Senate District 16-- Josh Stein won the race to fill Janet Cowell's vacant seat. His opponent, Jack Nichols was endorsed by the NC Homebuilders in the final days of the race.
Stein: 49%, 19,063
Nichols, 40%, 15692
Senate District 25-- Sen. Ellie Kinnaird defeated challenger Moses Carey by 27,084 to 14,982
Senate District 28-- Sen. Katie Dorsett defeated challenger Bruce Davis by 20,509 to 11,063.
House 7-- Rep. Angela Bryant defeated challenger Jean Reaves by 10,686 to 3360.
House 100-- Rep. Tricia Cotham defeated challenger Lloyd Scher by 7679 to 2074
House 119 -- Rep. Phil Haire defeated Avram Friedman by 8659 to 3283.
Our two pro-conservation Republican Senators who faced primary races were also re-elected. In Senate District 36, Sen. Fletcher Hartsell defeated Thomas Hill by 7115 to 3313. In Senate District 42, Sen. Austin Allran defeated challenger Kitty Barnes, who is Chair of the Catawba County Commission, by 1

Campaign Watch, Washington: FOE Endorses Obama; LCV's Endorsements List

FOE Endorses Obama: Friends of the Earth (FOE) this week announced its endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama for president. The national environmental organization especially cited Obama's energy positions as a strong factor in its decision. In a news release, FOE president Brent Blackwelder said, " The 'gas tax holiday' debate is a defining moment in the presidential race. The two other candidates responded with sham solutions that won't ease pain at the pump, but Senator Obama refused to play that typical Washington game. Instead, Obama called for real solutions that would make transportation more affordable and curb global warming. He showed the courage and candor we expect from a president." FOE also cited Obama's broad pro-environment record, including a 96 per cent voting score from the League of Conservation Voters. FOE had previously endorsed John Edwards in the presidential contest. More info on FOE's endorsement can be found at http://www.foeaction.org/Obama.

LCV's Endorsements List: The national League of Conservation Voters (LCV) has made three Senate and 18 House endorsements so far this year. The following are LCV's 2008 endorsements to date:

Senate:
Mark Udall (D) CO; Jeanne Shaheen (D) NH; Tom Udall (D) NM
House:
Jerry McNerney (D) CA-11; Joe Courtney (D) CT-02; Mike Castle (R) DE-AL; Bill Foster (D) IL-14; Chellie Pingree (D) ME-01; Wayne Gilchrest** (R) MD-01; Donna Edwards** (D) MD-04; Vern Ehlers (R) MI-03; Mark Schauer (D) MI-07; Gary Peters (D) MI-09; Kay Barnes (D) MO-06; Larry Kissell (D) NC-08; Frank Lobiondo (R) NJ-02; Martin Heinrich (D) NM-01; Ben Ray Lujan** (D) NM-03; Stephen Black** (D) OH-02; Victoria Wulsin** (D) OH-02; Tom Brinkman** (R) OH-02.

[KEY: ** = Primary Endorsement; Italics = Special Election Endorsement]

Ongoing endorsement announcements by LCV may be monitored at its website, http://lcv.org/campaigns/endorsements/.

3/28/2008

Environmental ScoreCard, CCNC

http://www.conservationcouncilnc.org/advocacy/scorecard_2007.pdf
[note: Our own Harris Blake is among 'the filthy five']

2/23/2008

McCain Scores Flat Zero

http://lcv.org/scorecard/
McCain's score is lower even than Elizabeth Dole's (7%).