Showing posts with label biotech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biotech. Show all posts
6/20/2009
2/15/2008
6/09/2007
Urgent--Call or Write
ACTION ALERT-Call or write your congressional representative
requesting removal of recently added Sec. 123 in the 2007 Farm Bill draft that
would prevent states and counties from determining whether genetically
modified crops can be grown.
The biotech industry and agribusiness have been pushing similar state
bills, but now they are trying to hide it in the very lengthy Farm Bill.
Please write to the Chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture,
Collin C. Peterson, MN and other members of that committee. You can view
the list of committee members at:
http://agriculture.house.gov/inside/members.html
Many house members prefer that you contact them via their web site.
Sample letter to members of the House Committee on Agriculture
(You can cut and paste this letter or modify as you choose)
Subject: No preemptive language in the Farm Bill to override local
democratically-passed laws that protect citizens from risky foods
Dear (name of representative);
I write to strongly oppose the pre-emptive language of Section 123
"Effect of USDA Inspection and Determination of Non-Regulated Status," in
the House Farm Bill inserted by the subcommittee on Livestock, Diary and
Poultry on May 24.
This language in the Farm Bill would preempt the rights of states and
localities to pass regulations regarding food or agricultural products
or methods that the USDA has granted "non-regulated status."
"SEC 123. EFFECT OF USDA INSPECTION AND DETERMINATION OF NON-REGULATED
STATUS. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no State or
locality shall make any law prohibiting the use in commerce of an article that
the Secretary of Agriculture has:
(1.) inspected and passed; or
(2.) determined to be of non-regulated status."
If included in the Farm Bill, this would negate all current state and
local safety laws, including laws on genetically engineered crops and
organisms. Hiding this provision in the Farm Bill without full public
debate would negate the will of voters who have decided that precautions
should be taken until genetically engineered agricultural products can
be proven safe.
I urge you to oppose any language in the Farm Bill that would preempt
state and local rights to make democratic decisions to protect their own
health, food safety, and agricultural production.
Sincerely,
(Your name)
requesting removal of recently added Sec. 123 in the 2007 Farm Bill draft that
would prevent states and counties from determining whether genetically
modified crops can be grown.
The biotech industry and agribusiness have been pushing similar state
bills, but now they are trying to hide it in the very lengthy Farm Bill.
Please write to the Chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture,
Collin C. Peterson, MN and other members of that committee. You can view
the list of committee members at:
http://agriculture.house.gov/inside/members.html
Many house members prefer that you contact them via their web site.
Sample letter to members of the House Committee on Agriculture
(You can cut and paste this letter or modify as you choose)
Subject: No preemptive language in the Farm Bill to override local
democratically-passed laws that protect citizens from risky foods
Dear (name of representative);
I write to strongly oppose the pre-emptive language of Section 123
"Effect of USDA Inspection and Determination of Non-Regulated Status," in
the House Farm Bill inserted by the subcommittee on Livestock, Diary and
Poultry on May 24.
This language in the Farm Bill would preempt the rights of states and
localities to pass regulations regarding food or agricultural products
or methods that the USDA has granted "non-regulated status."
"SEC 123. EFFECT OF USDA INSPECTION AND DETERMINATION OF NON-REGULATED
STATUS. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no State or
locality shall make any law prohibiting the use in commerce of an article that
the Secretary of Agriculture has:
(1.) inspected and passed; or
(2.) determined to be of non-regulated status."
If included in the Farm Bill, this would negate all current state and
local safety laws, including laws on genetically engineered crops and
organisms. Hiding this provision in the Farm Bill without full public
debate would negate the will of voters who have decided that precautions
should be taken until genetically engineered agricultural products can
be proven safe.
I urge you to oppose any language in the Farm Bill that would preempt
state and local rights to make democratic decisions to protect their own
health, food safety, and agricultural production.
Sincerely,
(Your name)
3/15/2007
Court Halt on GMO Alfalfa
Court Halt on GMO Alfalfa Shows USDA Failure
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/031507O.shtml
A court decision overturning US government approval for a Monsanto biotech alfalfa
underscores complaints made for years that the USDA is failing to adequately oversee genetically-altered crops. US District Court Judge Charles Breyer of the NorthernDistrict of California immediately halted seed sales and ordered that any planting must cease after March 30 following his determination that the USDA violated the law in allowing unrestricted commercial planting of the crop. The judge said theUSDA should have prepared an environmental impact statement before deregulating the Roundup Ready alfalfa.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/031507O.shtml
A court decision overturning US government approval for a Monsanto biotech alfalfa
underscores complaints made for years that the USDA is failing to adequately oversee genetically-altered crops. US District Court Judge Charles Breyer of the NorthernDistrict of California immediately halted seed sales and ordered that any planting must cease after March 30 following his determination that the USDA violated the law in allowing unrestricted commercial planting of the crop. The judge said theUSDA should have prepared an environmental impact statement before deregulating the Roundup Ready alfalfa.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)